Competence Call Center
48 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Aachen 1
14.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Aachen 2
04.04.2021
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Not recommendable employer.
Barcelona (ES) 3
02.08.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. High payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 4
28.08.2007
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Beneficial career. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 5
09.08.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 6
24.06.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Problematic management style. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 7
09.09.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 8
13.07.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 9
27.09.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Useful management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 10
11.06.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 11
02.12.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Good Management. Interesting tasks. Below-average salary. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 12
02.07.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 13
16.06.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Acceptable service. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Berlin 14
27.11.2008
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 15
20.01.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 16
04.03.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 17
24.01.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Interesting tasks. Fair payments. Good future prospects. Recommendable workplace.
Berlin 18
27.03.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Good Management. Excellent employer.
Berlin 19
03.04.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Good future prospects. Satisfactory employment site.
Berlin 20
08.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 21
17.05.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Dresden 22
02.10.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Dresden 23
18.02.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Beneficial career. Reasonable job provider.
Dresden 24
02.01.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Dresden 25
12.06.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Dresden 26
09.02.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Dresden 27
29.01.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Dresden 28
25.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Dresden 29
03.01.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Reasonable job provider.
Dresden 30
03.01.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Reasonable job provider.
Dresden 31
27.05.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Below-average salary. Average recognition. Reasonable job provider.
Dresden 32
27.01.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Dresden 33
28.03.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Essen 34
11.05.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 35
28.05.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 36
20.01.2009
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Germany 37
06.01.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 38
13.06.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 39
09.10.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 40
09.10.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Germany 41
17.02.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Germany 42
05.04.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Satisfactory staff work. Satisfactory employment site.
Germany 43
23.04.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Leipzig 44
08.04.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Employers with criticisms.
Wien 45
17.03.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Employers with criticisms.
Wien 46
16.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. No filling operation. Fair payments. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Wien 47
05.11.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Useful management. Acceptable service. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Reasonable job provider.
Wien 48
18.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent work atmosphere. Filling employment. First class salary. Recommendable workplace.
